Treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic early-onset pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of patients with early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC; age ≤ 50 years at diagnosis) is on the rise, placing a heavy burden on individuals, families, and society. The role of combination therapy including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in non-metastatic EOPC is not well-defined. AIM: To investigate the treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic EOPC. METHODS: A total of 277 patients with non-metastatic EOPC who were treated at our institution between 2017 and 2021 were investigated retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 34.6 months, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates for the entire cohort were 84.3%, 51.5%, and 27.6%, respectively. The median OS of patients with localized disease who received surgery alone and adjuvant therapy (AT) were 21.2 months and 28.8 months, respectively (P = 0.007). The median OS of patients with locally advanced disease who received radiotherapy-based combination therapy (RCT), surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and chemotherapy were 28.5 months, 25.6 months, and 14.0 months, respectively (P = 0.002). The median OS after regional recurrence were 16.0 months, 13.4 months, and 8.9 months in the RCT, chemotherapy, and supportive therapy groups, respectively (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, pathological grade, T-stage, N-stage, and resection were independent prognostic factors for non-metastatic EOPC. CONCLUSION: AT improves postoperative survival in localized patients. Surgery after NAT and RCT are the preferred therapeutic options for patients with locally advanced EOPC.

Survival Outcomes and Failure Patterns in Patients with Inoperable Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy.

This study investigated the long-term results, failure patterns, and prognostic factors of patients with initially inoperable non-metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT). Between January 2016 and December 2020, a total of 168 non-metastatic PC patients, who were surgically unresectable or medically inoperable, were enrolled to receive definitive RT, with or without chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of locoregional and distant progression was estimated using the competing risks model. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to determine the influence of prognostic variables on OS. With a median follow-up of 20.2 months, the median OS (mOS) and median PFS (mPFS) from diagnosis were 18.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.5-21.7 months] and 12.3 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.3 months), respectively. The mOS and mPFS from RT were 14.3 months (95% CI, 12.7-18.3 months) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 5.5-12.0 months), respectively. The corresponding 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS from diagnosis and RT were 72.1%, 36.6%, and 21.5% as well as 59.0%, 28.8%, and 19.0%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, stage I-II (p = 0.032), pre-RT CA19-9 ≤ 130 U/mL (p = 0.011), receiving chemotherapy (p = 0.003), and a biologically effective dose (BED10) > 80 Gy (p = 0.014) showed a significant favorable influence on OS. Among the 59 available patients with definite progression sites, the recurrences of local, regional, and distant progression were 33.9% (20/59), 18.6% (11/59), and 59.3% (35/59), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidences of locoregional progression after RT were 19.5% (95% CI, 11.5-27.5%) and 32.8% (95% CI, 20.8-44.8%), respectively. Definitive RT was associated with long-term primary tumor control, resulting in superior survival in patients with inoperable non-metastatic PC. Further prospective randomized trials are warranted to validate our results in these patients.

Risk factors, prognostic predictors, and nomograms for pancreatic cancer patients with initially diagnosed synchronous liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Liver metastasis (LM) remains a major cause of cancer-related death in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) and is associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, identifying the risk and prognostic factors in PC patients with LM (PCLM) is essential as it may aid in providing timely medical interventions to improve the prognosis of these patients. However, there are limited data on risk and prognostic factors in PCLM patients. AIM: To investigate the risk and prognostic factors of PCLM and develop corresponding diagnostic and prognostic nomograms. METHODS: Patients with primary PC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Results Database. Risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis to develop the diagnostic mode. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model was used to determine the prognostic factors needed to develop the prognostic model. The performance of the two nomogram models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and risk subgroup classification. The Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 33459 patients with PC in this study. Of them, 11458 (34.2%) patients had LM at initial diagnosis. Age at diagnosis, primary site, lymph node metastasis, pathological type, tumor size, and pathological grade were identified as independent risk factors for LM in patients with PC. Age > 70 years, adenocarcinoma, poor or anaplastic differentiation, lung metastases, no surgery, and no chemotherapy were the independently associated risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with PCLM. The C- index of diagnostic and prognostic nomograms were 0.731 and 0.753, respectively. The two nomograms could accurately predict the occurrence and prognosis of patients with PCLM based on the observed analysis results of ROC curves, calibration plots, and DCA curves. The prognostic nomogram could stratify patients into prognostic groups and perform well in internal validation. CONCLUSION: Our study identified the risk and prognostic factors in patients with PCLM and developed corresponding diagnostic and prognostic nomograms to help clinicians in subsequent clinical evaluation and intervention. External validation is required to confirm these results.

Survival benefits and disparities in radiation therapy for elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Older patients represent a unique subgroup of the cancer patient population, for which the role of cancer therapy requires special consideration. However, the outcomes of radiation therapy (RT) in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are not well-defined in the literature. AIM: To explore the use and effectiveness of RT in the treatment of elderly patients with PDAC in clinical practice. METHODS: Data from patients with PDAC aged ≥ 65 years between 2004 and 2018 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with RT administration. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify prognostic factors for OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics between the RT and non-RT groups. Subgroup analyses were performed based on clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 12245 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 2551 (20.8%) were treated with RT and 9694 (79.2%) were not. The odds of receiving RT increased with younger age, diagnosis in an earlier period, primary site in the head, localized disease, greater tumor size, and receiving chemotherapy (all P < 0.05). Before PSM, the RT group had better outcomes than did the non-RT group [median OS, 14.0 vs 6.0 mo; hazard ratio (HR) for OS: 0.862, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.819-0.908, P < 0.001; and HR for CSS: 0.867, 95%CI: 0.823-0.914, P < 0.001]. After PSM, the survival benefit associated with RT remained comparable (median OS: 14.0 vs 11.0 mo; HR for OS: 0.818, 95%CI: 0.768-0.872, P < 0.001; and HR for CSS: 0.816, 95%CI: 0.765-0.871, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the survival benefits (OS and CSS) of RT were more significant in patients aged 65 to 80 years, in regional and distant stages, with no surgery, and receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: RT improved the outcome of elderly patients with PDAC, particularly those aged 65 to 80 years, in regional and distant stages, with no surgery, and who received chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our results.

A comparative study of functional MRI in predicting response of regional nodes to induction chemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Purpose: To identify and compare the value of functional MRI (fMRI) in predicting the early response of metastatic cervical lymph nodes (LNs) to induction chemotherapy (IC) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Methods: This prospective study collected 94 metastatic LNs from 40 consecutive NPC patients treated with IC from January 2021 to May 2021. Conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were performed before and after IC. The parameter maps apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusion coefficient (MD), mean kurtosis (MK), Dslow, Dfast, perfusion fraction (PF), Ktrans, Ve, and Kep) of the metastatic nodes were calculated by the Functool postprocessing software. All LNs were classified as the responding group (RG) and non-responding group (NRG) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. The fMRI parameters were compared before and after IC and between the RG and the NRG. The significant parameters are fitted by logistic regression analysis to produce new predictive factor (PRE)-predicted probabilities. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to further identify and compare the efficacy of the parameters. Results: After IC, the mean values of ADC, MD, and Dslow significantly increased, while MK, Dfast, and Ktrans values decreased dramatically, while no significant difference was detected in Ve and Kep. Compared with NRG, PF-pre and Ktrans-pre values in the RG were higher statistically. The areas under the ROC for the pretreatment PF, Ktrans, and PRE were 0.736, 0.722, and 0.810, respectively, with the optimal cutoff value of 222 × 10-4, 934 × 10-3/min, and 0.6624, respectively. Conclusions: The pretreatment fMRI parameters PF and Ktrans showed promising potential in predicting the response of the metastatic LNs to IC in NPC patients. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was approved by the ethics board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, and registered on 30 January 2021, in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=121198, identifier (ChiCTR2100042863).